Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 495 days older than GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 34% better in Monster Hunter: World than GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 82 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 4 vs 2 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.89 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
59.72 GTexel/s
23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1354 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1493 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
