Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GT 755M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 308 days newer than GeForce GT 755M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 50 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 31% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GT 755M - 68 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M - 4 vs 2 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 755M
Mobile • Jun 25th, 2013
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 755M
Mobile • Jun 25th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
7.84 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
31.36 GTexel/s
17%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
