Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 755M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 252 days newer than GeForce GT 755M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield V than GeForce GT 755M - 96 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M - 3 vs 2 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 25th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 25th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
7.84 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
31.36 GTexel/s
30%
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |