Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GT 630M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 768 days newer than GeForce GT 630M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 33 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 100% better in F1 22 than GeForce GT 630M - 76 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - 4 vs 1 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
660 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |