Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 630M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 712 days newer than GeForce GT 630M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 33 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce GT 630M - 104 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - 3 vs 1 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GT 630M
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 660 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
