Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 1010 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1966 days older than GeForce GT 1010.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 29% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GT 1010 - 130 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 - 4 vs 2 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GT 1010
Desktop • Jan 13th, 2021
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 1010
Desktop • Jan 13th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
11.74 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
23.49 GTexel/s
9%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jan 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 48.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1228 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1468 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
