Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce 920MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 211 days older than GeForce 920MX.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 16 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 367% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce 920MX - 42 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX - 4 vs 2 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 25th, 2016
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | HBM |
64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
965 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
993 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |