Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Iris Graphics 550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 5 days older than Iris Graphics 550.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Iris Graphics 550 - 361 vs 324 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | HBM |
System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |