Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 3263 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 50% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $99.99 vs $199.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Valheim than Radeon R9 290 - $1.56 vs $2.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 30 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Arc A310 - 69 vs 64 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 947 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |