The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $1.08 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 1% cheaper – $88.02 vs $89.10
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 31 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
$88.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$59.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$79.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$53.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$71.65
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$108.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$71.65
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, $
$89.1
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
