The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $240.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 45% cheaper – $299.00 vs $539.00
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$539
55%
Value, $/FPS
$5.18/FPS
86%
Buy on Amazon
$539.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$239.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
