Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 564 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 24% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $226.72 vs $299.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $1.86 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 120 vs 295 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
78%
Price, $
$299.99
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6990 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
122
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
85%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
42%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$499 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR6 |
2048-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |