Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 624 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 68% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 42 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 48% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $154.99 vs $299.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $6.2 vs $7.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 75 vs 295 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
42
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.14/FPS
86%
Price, $
$299.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6685 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
25
59%
Value, $/FPS
$6.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
23%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$499 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |