Buy on Amazon
$154.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Buy on Amazon
$154.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$236.95
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Buy on Amazon
$174.99
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Buy on Amazon
$329.99
In Stock
Base Clock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$339.99
In Stock
Base Clock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$370.99
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 7600 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 7600 XT is 1721 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon RX 7600 XT - $154.99 vs $329.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than Radeon RX 7600 XT - $3.44 vs $3.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT - 75 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
- Performs up to 98% better in God of War than GeForce GTX 1650 - 89 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
45
50%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2825 minutes ago
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.71/FPS
92%
Price, $
$329.99
46%
FPS Winner
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7600 XT Gaming OC 16G Graphics Card, 3X WINDFORCE Fans 16GB 128-bit GDDR6, GV-R76XTGAMING OC-16GD Video Card
Buy for $329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
26%
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Pixel Fillrate
176.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
352.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi III |
$149 | MSRP | $329 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1980 MHz |
| 1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2755 MHz |
| 2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
Builds Using GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon RX 7600 XT
God of War, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
85 FPS
$17.65/FPS
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
27 FPS
$30.74/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$829.99
In Stock
20 FPS
$32.5/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10105F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$649.99
In Stock
31 FPS
$24.84/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-12400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$769.99
In Stock
22 FPS
$36.36/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3600
4 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
20 FPS
$44.8/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10105F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$896.04
In Stock
31 FPS
$25.77/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$799
In Stock
20 FPS
$38.45/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400F
16 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$769
In Stock
22 FPS
$40.86/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
31 FPS
$25.74/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$798
In Stock
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
