Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6700M outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6700M is 2104 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Performs up to 44% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R9 Nano - 104 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 135 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 150% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 10 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Radeon RX 6700M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX 6700M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
153.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
345.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
10 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 160-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1489 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
