Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 3038 days older than GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
95%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
54%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| $279 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
| 933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
