Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 46% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $101.05 vs $187.26
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 55% better in DOOM Eternal than Radeon R7 250 - 203 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78131 minutes ago
Buy for $187.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
17.419962335216574%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
17.42201294879341%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |