Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W5500 is 975 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Performs up to 167% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Arc A310 - 16 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 64% cheaper than Radeon Pro W5500 - $99.99 vs $274.96
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro W5500 - $16.66 vs $17.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 30 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.18/FPS
96%
Price, $
$274.96
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $274.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18754 minutes ago
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Alchemist |
$399 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1744 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1855 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |