Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 529 days older than Radeon Pro 5300.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 85 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro 5300 - 83 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro 5300 - 6 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 4th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 4th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |