Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5300 outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5300 is 2422 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Radeon R7 260 - 357 vs 330 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 4th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 4th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
132 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Aug 4th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |