Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5300 outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5300 is 2345 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Performs up to 23% better in World of Tanks than Radeon R9 280 - 155 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 85 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon Pro 5300
Desktop • Aug 4th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro 5300
Desktop • Aug 4th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
132 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 4th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
