Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2390 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Xeon X5675 - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 16 vs 12 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |