Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2704 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon W3550 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |