Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 80% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon W3520 - 126 vs 70 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |