Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2191B outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2191B is 1844 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2191B
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2191B doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
43
78%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Dec 21st, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2191B | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Dec 21st, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |