Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 1730 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 533 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2135 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
503
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18074 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |