Buy on Amazon
€78.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1638 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon Silver 4116 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G6900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
