Buy on Amazon
€50.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon Silver 4116 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Silver 4116 is 189 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G3930 - 513 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 51 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
