Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2725 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5620 - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |