Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1283 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 61 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |