Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 160 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |