Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 237 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €179.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |