Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-2670 - 95 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 51 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |