Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 644 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 55 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
