Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1302 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |