Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2218 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2660 - 196 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |