Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 is 180 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Pentium G645T - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
148
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |