Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2320 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2320 is 184 days older than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2320 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2640 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €25.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i5-2320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |