Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Saints Row than Xeon E5-2640 - 164 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12874 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |