Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 51 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |