Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 183 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€475.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €475.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |