Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €475.94 vs €579.04
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - 324 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - €1.79 vs €2.12 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €475.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12229 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
324
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.04
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |