Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3138 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 217 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€293
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €293 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
15.453194650817236%
Multi-Core
2118
13.055538433088826%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |