Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1691 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 289 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |