Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €437.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
38.55421686746988%
Multi-Core
3898
22.301046970650496%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |