Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 437 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 137 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
93.15068493150685%
Multi-Core
3898
67.27649292371419%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |