Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 544.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 544.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 136 vs 118 FPS
  • Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


FPS

118

86%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

136

100%

Value, €/FPS

€4.01/FPS

100%

Price, €

€544.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 544.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 197 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


Single-Core

1088

40%

Multi-Core

3898

23%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

vs
Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

Jun 20th, 2016Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5CollectionCore i9
Broadwell-E/EPCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
24
8Threads
32
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
140 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size
10 nm
35.0x
Multiplier20.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Core i9-13900

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.