Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 1667 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 21% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 231 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
53.021442495126706%
Multi-Core
3898
39.51343132285859%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |