Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 994 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 685 vs 619 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
685
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |