Buy on Amazon
€208.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2744 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 130 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3,9 GHz/4,9 GHz, 12 MB di cache)
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
